Dedicated to the opines CG.
Please opine.
| John Dunkle on A Fake Debate on Abortion | |
| Pat Richards on A Fake Debate on Abortion | |
| John Dunkle on A Fake Debate on Abortion | |
| Pat Richards on A Fake Debate on Abortion | |
| soniapataki on A Fake Debate on Abortion | |
| Pat Richards on A Fake Debate on Abortion | |
| bloggingfem on A Fake Debate on Abortion | |
| John Dunkle on A Fake Debate on Abortion | |
| Pat Richards on Unintended Consequences | |
| Pat Richards on Unintended Consequences | |
| Pat Richards on A Fake Debate on Abortion | |
| Pat Richards on A Fake Debate on Abortion | |
| Pat Richards on A Fake Debate on Abortion | |
| Pat Richards on A Fake Debate on Abortion | |
| John Dunkle on A Fake Debate on Abortion |
Blog at WordPress.com. — Theme: Connections by www.vanillamist.com.
April 28, 2011 at 5:20 pm
In response to “What credates [sic] feral children? Say “who” rather, and the answer is God.”
So, the question was, what creates feral children– you’re smart enough to provide an intelligent answer.
You’re also smart enough to provide an intelligent answer to how God views me if I abandon at any age a child I insisted be born.
I’m still waiting.
April 28, 2011 at 8:55 pm
No I’m not, I don’t know what creates them.
My response to your second question is good.
April 29, 2011 at 5:48 am
a good Jesuitical answer, but not a sufficient answer, as it provides no information. And what is the reason for that?
April 29, 2011 at 5:51 am
You refuse to do any research on feral children, but if you are curious about how to protect yourself legally when engaged in stalking, you research that. Why are you selectively incurious?
April 29, 2011 at 10:56 am
I’ll research feral children when I get the time. Right now I have to weed the radishes.
April 30, 2011 at 9:26 am
You will never research feral children. It’s far too risky to your emotional well-being.
April 30, 2011 at 2:59 pm
I’ll have to take your word for it, Chuck, cause I get lost in Abortionisticky.
May 1, 2011 at 5:26 pm
Thank you for proving my thesis.
May 1, 2011 at 7:48 pm
You’re welcome.
May 1, 2011 at 5:49 am
The best thing for me I found in this bag is that the camera is easy to retrieve when I pack it in the bag and it is ready to shoot. Many times the shot is gone by the time you finish setting up to take it.
May 2, 2011 at 4:46 am
Hilly, you sound like Chuckles!
June 18, 2011 at 4:46 pm
Happy Father’s Day, “pro-choice” dads!
I congratulate you for choosing to raise to adulthood every child you wanted to see born, and I am impressed by your willingness to listen to your spouse or partner and follow her lead when you consider just how many children you think she should bear.
I also compliment you on the children you don’t have, children like the following:
“Lisa,” Joel Steinberg’s and Hedda Nussbaum’s adopted child, who was beaten by Joel in a cocaine rage and left to die after months if not years of suffering abuse.
The grade schooler whose mother called him “It,” instead of naming him and made him eat a fouled diaper when he said he was hungry.
The infant who was raised in a cardboard box and grew up believing that his mother and her series of boyfriends just happened to be people living in the same place as he was.
The two-year-old whose father left him to ride in a new car and died in a crash, who managed to survive on trash and water from the toilet until his military-service mother in Iraq found out her husband had been dead for almost a week.
The grandchildren of Beverly Russell, the South Carolina Republic State Committeeman, whose daughter suffered his molestation for years and drowned the two boys in the name of love.
The 13-year-old “wild child” in California who was rescued from a lifetime of being bound to a potty chair, unable to speak, walk or care for herself in a reasonably normal fashion.
You’ve been a better dad than these kids (and literally millions more) had, and you know what it takes to do right by your kids, even when it calls for not having any more. You have the maturity to consider all forms of birth control, including abortion, and you know that unless you have control over how many children you and their mom have, you won’t have control over how well you can care for them. Happy Father’s Day!
June 20, 2011 at 5:24 pm
All these guys you mention here, Chuck, were killers’ helpers like yourself. And you’re wishing them “happy fathers’ day”?
July 6, 2011 at 6:24 pm
A month goes my — what am I, talking to myself? Anybody who wants to keep baby killing legal, say something! Sure, you’ll have to say something stupid (except for one thing) but say something anyway. Just for proving you’re alive I’ll like you.
July 7, 2011 at 11:38 am
The major complaint so-called “pro-lifers” lodge against the concept of aborticentrism– i.e., the little-recognized fact that they are so fixated on abortion that they generally disregard the fate of the subsequent– is that it is “psychobabble,” a fancy term for a type of ad hominem attack.
The charge is baseless and ill-considered, made without an understanding of the literature supporting the concept. For the term to have any appliability, the accuser would have to address the body of literature on which aborticentrism rests, and they haven’t.
July 8, 2011 at 7:52 am
“Literature” my foot. Who can read that fakery? You guys take words like literature and science and pervert them.
March 9, 2012 at 1:21 pm
so give us an example Dunkle, you have nothing more than psychobabel in most of your posts, what fakery do you speak of?
March 9, 2012 at 8:24 pm
Andrew, what do you know about aborticentrism?