This page is dedicated to the Pro Life violence of John Dunkle,
We do not agree, but in the spirit of discourse, here it is,
Please opine.
Twitter
Visit Our Facebook Page
-
Please Opine
John Dunkle on A Fake Debate on Abortion Pat Richards on A Fake Debate on Abortion John Dunkle on A Fake Debate on Abortion Pat Richards on A Fake Debate on Abortion soniapataki on A Fake Debate on Abortion Pat Richards on A Fake Debate on Abortion bloggingfem on A Fake Debate on Abortion John Dunkle on A Fake Debate on Abortion Pat Richards on Unintended Consequences Pat Richards on Unintended Consequences Pat Richards on A Fake Debate on Abortion Pat Richards on A Fake Debate on Abortion Pat Richards on A Fake Debate on Abortion Pat Richards on A Fake Debate on Abortion John Dunkle on A Fake Debate on Abortion
April 21, 2011 at 2:10 pm
So let’s say I get cancer. The “natural” thing would be to let it go, to deteriorate and die a natural death. To get chemo would be a “disorder,” John?
April 21, 2011 at 4:11 pm
No, cancer is the disorder. It can be attacked, perhaps with surgery. But removing a healthy body part, or body, is barbarism.
April 22, 2011 at 9:11 am
Then removing the body of the baby and killing it of a partial molar pregnancy is barbarism?
April 22, 2011 at 9:15 am
Or what about the well over 250,000 well known genetic, and errors of inborn metabolism?
Or the well described 2.5% Anomoly rate among babies.
Are those healthy babies?
April 22, 2011 at 2:59 pm
John,
There are lots of questions like these you never answer.
You are smarter than me.
Show them their errors, and why one should Never do an abortion, no matter what the case, as it is all in Gods hands, and we must have faith in God.
April 22, 2011 at 3:09 pm
I’ll answer Yankovitz cause I love that name: no.
April 22, 2011 at 5:28 pm
What do you mean?
They are still babies – they do not deserve to be aborted!
April 21, 2011 at 5:31 pm
From #38, above: “This is, so far, you[r] silliest of all. Someone is not a human being unles someone else cares for her?”
****
Well, you refuse to learn anything about feral children, so you can’t even discuss what makes a life human rather than simply humanoid.
The danger of knowing about feral children is that as a movement member, your standing would be imperiled. As Pope put it, “Where ignorance is bliss/ ‘Tis folly to be wise.” if you started thinking about nurturing the children whose birth you insisted upon, you’d eventually come to the point where you’d have to choose between caring for life or continuing to be so-called “pro-life.”
It’s smart of you in the short term to not go there; in the long run, it’s a terrible choice to have made.
April 21, 2011 at 7:35 pm
I didn’t get past this, Chuck: “so you can’t even discuss what makes a life human rather than simply humanoid.”
Everybody, even the scurviest, rottenest, most vile person, who’s been hated from day 1, is human. There are no such things as humanoids, except in some science fiction writer’s imagination. Now let me read the rest.
April 22, 2011 at 6:12 am
Your researcher won’t even go so far as to consult a dictionary? It is a word; it has a definition. You could look it up.
April 21, 2011 at 7:44 pm
“if you started thinking about nurturing the children whose birth you insisted upon” — you too, Chuck, should insist that people be born, reach their first birthdays, reach their twentieth birthdays, and reach their seventy-sixth birthdays if, like me, they’re seventy-five. You might be as selfish as I am and care little about what happens to them afterwards; however, you should insist that they not be murdered.
April 22, 2011 at 6:06 am
If I “insist they not be murdered” and walk away from them, to leave them exposed to cruelty, illness, ignorance, starvation and death at an early age from violence or long-suffered disease, who gains?
Not them.
I do. I have stood foursquare against Death and won. And it hasn’t cost me what it’s costing them. Nor do I have to share my resources with them, doing unto them what I would want others to do unto me to shelter me from those hazards and more.
What does that say about me, that I am more than willing to have them pay a lifelong price for my self-defined victory?
April 22, 2011 at 6:13 am
I guess you’re implyinbg here that you can encourage their murders becausse, you know, life is tough. Did I get it right?
April 22, 2011 at 6:23 am
answer the question, please. It was about caring for them because I wanted them born.
There was nothing in it about me wanting them dead. That’s your focus.
Can you shake off your aborticentrism enough to state your opinion of me, who would abandon a child I wanted born?
April 22, 2011 at 10:54 am
I guess you’re implying here that you want them born. Did I get ir right? And then you’re implying that you are the only pro-lifer who cares for them after they’re born. Did I get it right? Sorry that I have to look for the implications in what you write, Chuckles, but your literal meanings are nonsense.
April 22, 2011 at 12:00 pm
I am not implying anything about being a pro-lifer. The question is, what does it say about me when I abandon a child that I insisted be born.
April 22, 2011 at 12:08 pm
You make perfect sense aborticentrism to anyone with one last neuron still working in their brain.
April 22, 2011 at 12:47 pm
It says you’e like me. I’m assuming you abondon them too after insisting they reach their first birthdays. (Or you into infanticide too?)
April 22, 2011 at 2:29 pm
Yu can see you’ve really got your butt in a sling on the abandonment issue, can’t you?
How do you suppose God feels about men who abandon children whose birth they insisted upon? Do you think He’ll send me to Hell? If not, what would the reason be that He would spare me?
April 22, 2011 at 3:03 pm
“How do you suppose God feels about men who abandon children whose birth they insisted upon?”
How do you suppose God feels about men who abandon children whose first birthday they insisted upon?
July 12, 2011 at 12:20 am
I love the Incredibly Powerful Hammering you Pro Lifers are getting on this blog. This is one of my favorite blogs to read.
April 23, 2011 at 7:21 am
Well, you make it sound as though you realize that when you die you are going to be in judgment before a God who will confront you with the lifelong sufferings of hundreds of children whom you abandoned after you compelled them to be born.
It also seems the reason He will be so harsh toward you is that you compelled them to be born to satisfy your own ego, rather than to help them arrive at an adulthood even more fulfilling than your own.
Thanks for your answer.
April 23, 2011 at 10:30 am
Well, you make it sound as though you realize that when you die you are going to be in judgment before a God who will confront you with the lifelong sufferings of hundreds of children whom you abandoned after you compelled them to reach their first birthday.
It also seems the reason He will be so harsh toward you is that you compelled them to reach their first birthday to satisfy your own ego, rather than to help them arrive at an adulthood even more fulfilling than your own.
Thanks for your answer.
April 25, 2011 at 5:58 am
Do you really believe that????
April 25, 2011 at 7:52 am
I’m not sure because I don’t know if you will accept infanticide as you have accepted feticide. What do you think.
April 25, 2011 at 12:02 pm
What do either of those have to do with me walking away from a child whose birth I insisted upon??????????????
You’ll have to explain how “yes” or “no” depends on that; otherwise, I’ll just have to accept your answer as a “yes.”
April 25, 2011 at 12:14 pm
“What do either of those have to do with me walking away from a child whose birth I insisted upon?”
What do either of those have to do with my walking away from a child who first birthday I insisted upon?
April 23, 2011 at 9:20 am
So, Johnny boy, were you out at a clinic today? Which one? Anything happen?
April 23, 2011 at 10:31 am
Good and bad. Good: the place was closed. Bad: I forgot to turn on my cell to get Jerry’s message that it was closed.
April 25, 2011 at 8:35 am
But yesterday, Easter Sunday, Gerry and I visited two new baby killers’ homes (in addition to the two we’ve been visiting for a couple of years now). First visits are often a circus; two cop cars at each place, neighbors blocking the front sidewalk so we couldn’t walk back and forth, etc. Anyone want to join us next month?
April 25, 2011 at 9:53 am
Who are the new docs? What are their names? Just curious because, as you know, it’s rare to find new docs…
April 25, 2011 at 12:09 pm
Joel Lebed, Harris Rd. Cheltenham; Jay Sivits, Church Rd. Elkins Pk. The two before that on the fourth Sunday are Sondra Dantzic, Doylestown; Charles Benjamin, Fort Washington. We do another two on the third Sunday, including the beautiful, the articulate, the misguided Jen Boulanger; and we’re about to add two! I’ll let you know when I find out who they are.
May 4, 2011 at 10:44 pm
What a joy to find someone else who tnhkis this way.
May 5, 2011 at 8:08 am
Are we two of a kind, Delo?
May 5, 2011 at 2:11 pm
Birds of a feather, stick together.
May 5, 2011 at 2:43 pm
Drop the comma.
May 5, 2011 at 6:16 pm
Cleaning dishes is important since you do not want grease or old food to remain on dishes, possibly growing harmful bacteria, causing sickness. Have everyone wash hands often regular soap and water are fine.
May 9, 2011 at 1:15 pm
Chuck, you’re getting annoying.
July 6, 2011 at 6:27 pm
I can’t get a rise out of this guy anymore. Chuck, please repeat your four reasons for wanting to keep baby killing legal cause I forget ‘em. Well I remember the first: Dunkle and his ilk are sick, therefore, I can help kill people. What were the others.
July 14, 2011 at 5:20 am
Now the second comes back: let’s kill this little guy too because otherwise he might grow up to be like Ted Bundy. Common, Chuck, gimme the other two.
August 16, 2011 at 5:00 pm
This guy is crazy!
August 17, 2011 at 4:44 pm
Chuck’s not crazy, Rem, just disappointed.
August 17, 2011 at 6:13 pm
Remy, he’s not crazy; he’s a bully, he’s lied, he has no sense of empathy for the less fortunate and has never undertaken to rescue a child not of his family, social circle or church, and he can’t explain his position other than to repeat certain stock words: “torture” “rip” “her” “killers,” but he’s not crazy. He’s a classic aborticentric. You should read up on aborticentrism to understand his ilk.
August 18, 2011 at 2:07 pm
No, she didn’t, but somebody else I love helped kill his child. Doesn’t make any difference to me.
August 17, 2011 at 7:53 pm
I agree. I dont think John is crazy. Now, my brother, he is one crazy dude, but not John. He just focuses on the fetus, as if the woman it totally invisible. Makes me wonder sometimes if John’s wife had an abortion once….What do ya think, Charles?
August 18, 2011 at 2:09 pm
The above should be here and this should be there: Rem, this is Chuck’s first reason. See #16.
August 19, 2011 at 10:44 am
Now I’m really confused…
August 20, 2011 at 3:29 pm
My reply to you, Pat, in #18 should have been this: No, she didn’t, but somebody else I love helped kill his child. Doesn’t make any difference to me.
My reply to Chuck in #17 should have been this: Rem, this is Chuck’s first reason. See #16.
September 20, 2011 at 8:53 am
How come I’m a “top post” when nobody in a month has given me the time of day!
December 3, 2011 at 5:55 am
John Dunkle might be one person whose habits we cannot change. He seems to relish the attention Voice of Choice is lavishing upon him.
I have been told, however, that his wife Margaret would like him to find a new pastime. I think we should all give her our sympathy and ask if we can help her to encourage John to find more productive ways to spend his time.
Please call Margaret at home at 610-796-0627.
Sympathize with her in that it must be difficult to be so close to someone involved in such a violent movement.
Encourage her and wish her the best of luck in convincing him to stop harassing women and clinic workers.
And…
Tell her she will be in your thoughts/prayers and that you hope she has the support system needed to cope with his activities.
Please note that if anyone wanted to visit or write the Dunkels, they live at 214 Meadow Glen Lane Reading, PA 19607 (Note the corrected address).
January 16, 2012 at 3:56 pm
Well, John, how do you feel about this person posting your address? This is pretty tough stuff. Are you getting the calls?
February 13, 2012 at 11:30 am
for those who are interested, JD got caught trespassing this past weekend. he’s been warned. next time, things will be different if he continues to trespass on private property, property that is adjacent to the clinic
tough break
February 13, 2012 at 2:49 pm
Thanks for that update, Kate! Watch it, Johnny Boy! Was this at the new Allentown facility?
February 14, 2012 at 6:35 am
The beautiful part about being a self-proclaimed “pro-lifer” is that you do not have to commit yourself to any extra exertion. You expend only as much time, talent and energy as you want to. As soon as things get the least bit difficult, you can call it quits. So, having been warned that he risks some inconvenience to his time (jail), his talent (arguing in court) and his money (lawyer’s fees and fines), is he going to trespass again? No more likely than that he will adopt a child he doesn’t want to raise. . . aborticentrism, period.
March 9, 2012 at 1:26 pm
You would think, the insanity of one could be stirred, by (his wife) one that loves him, but with that, if he really wanted to fight the cause he would, live amongst the many who raise children as a foster family, give to the cause that way instead of ruining peoples, already hard enough day’s
is that some psycho-adolescent-babbel — Dunkle any thoughts?